ClickUp’s time tracking is optimized for billing, but many jurisdictions require documenting daily presence independently of project work. A dedicated presence tracking module would meet compliance needs without mixing legal records with financial data. Add a dedicated presence tracking feature, distinctly separated from billable time tracking, with minimal data capture, explicit notice/consent, role-based access, retention controls, and compliance-ready reporting. This will position ClickUp as a trustworthy, audit‑ready platform for teams operating under German, EU, and other global regulations. ## Regulatory context across countries Germany: Presence and working-time records intersect with GDPR and the Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG). Monitoring must be transparent, proportionate, and limited to what’s legally necessary; processing personal data requires lawful basis and strict purpose limitation. European Union (EU): Employee monitoring is permitted only within GDPR’s principles (lawfulness, transparency, data minimization, purpose limitation), with heightened scrutiny for surveillance-like tools. Separate, minimally intrusive presence logs align better with GDPR compliance than broad productivity tracking. United Kingdom: Similar to EU-style requirements post‑GDPR, with emphasis on impact assessments, notification, and proportionality in monitoring practices. United States: Laws vary by state, but employers generally must notify employees about monitoring; overbroad surveillance risks litigation and reputational harm. Clear policies and limited-scope tracking are recommended. Canada: Privacy statutes (e.g., PIPEDA provincially) emphasize consent, transparency, and data minimization; employers should document legitimate interests and limit retention. Australia & Mexico: Monitoring is lawful with clear notice and purpose limits; best practice favors explicit policies, opt‑in where applicable, and narrow data collection for compliance rather than productivity surveillance. Global guidance: Cross‑country reviews highlight consent/notice, retention limits, and scope control as common requirements; improper monitoring brings penalties and employee distrust, reinforcing the need to separate presence from billable tracking. --- ## Best practices for compliant presence tracking Data minimization: Record only start time, end time, and legally required breaks; avoid activity-level or device-level monitoring. > Aligns with GDPR principles and reduces legal exposure. Clear notice and consent: Provide written policy, obtain acknowledgment, and ensure employees can access their records. > Addresses transparency and trust requirements across jurisdictions. Separate systems and reports: Keep presence logs distinct from billable/project time to respect purpose limitation and simplify audits. > Minimizes scope creep and eases compliance reviews. Retention limits: Store presence data only for the statutory period, then securely delete. > Common mandate in privacy regimes to reduce risk. Works council engagement (DE/EU): Involve employee representatives when introducing monitoring-related tools. > Supports co‑determination expectations and legal harmony. --- ## Proposed feature scope Presence clock-in/out: One-click start/end plus break entry, independent of tasks. Policy and consent prompts: Configurable notices, acknowledgment tracking, and per‑workspace settings. Role-based visibility: Employees see and verify their entries; HR/Admin access for audits only. Dedicated reports and exports: Presence summaries by date/employee, separate from billing; exportable CSV/PDF for audits. Retention controls: Workspace-level retention periods and automated deletion. Regional compliance presets: Templates reflecting EU/DE, UK, US, CA, AU, MX requirements. --- ## Why ClickUp should implement this Compliance differentiation: A presence module aligned with GDPR/BDSG and international norms reduces legal risk and makes ClickUp viable for regulated teams. Trust and adoption: Transparent, minimal tracking builds employee confidence and eases works council approvals, accelerating enterprise adoption. Operational clarity: Clean separation of compliance presence from billable time prevents data misuse and simplifies audits, reducing admin overhead. Global readiness: Harmonizes diverse legal expectations, enabling multinational rollout without custom tooling.