Feature Requests

A dedicated page for where generated artifacts can be retrieved and organized. Like the Clips Panel.

A Gallery view would make a useful addition to the Time, List, and Board views. In the Gallery view, tasks would appear on cards, just like the existing Board view, but without constraining cards to columns. Board view is good for workflows. Gallery view would be good for filtering and browsing. The important thing to realize is that tasks don't always get done in order, and some don't require a workflow. A reading list is one example of a use case in which I might want to filter and browse tasks in a gallery view. Choosing the next blog topic for an editorial calendar is another. The screenshot shows an example of the gallery view used in Airtable. This example happens to show recipes—another example of 'tasks' I might want to filter and browse.

I would like to be able to take an artifact I have created and move it to a list or folder level.

Let us know what adjustments or additions you'd like to see to Workload view!

► As with anything created in business, artifacts often need to be generated in an iterative manner. In the current artifact-generating landscape, each time a new change is made, a new artifact has to be created. This is Why This is a Problem: When attempting to generate an artifact to use as an embed in a dashboard and trying to iterate on it before reaching its final state, we encounter issues. Even once we have finalized the design and structure of the artifact, the very nature of it is something that will need to be updated from time to time. Each time the agent updates that artifact, it generates a new URL for the embed and has no ability to simply update the existing artifact. This is a friction in the workflow that we would all greatly benefit from having removed. Additionally, the edit gear button on these artifacts would greatly benefit from having the conversation—or rather the genesis of its conversation and iteration flow—documented. So, when changes need to be made, you can click on the gear and add the changes that you would like to see implemented. Currently, the way this works is you have to remember where the conversation was with what agent for the artifact and go looking for it, robbing us of precious time that ClickUp gave us back in many other ways. It is needless and can be easily rectified. Artifact Hub: Someone here also recommended that there be a hub for artifacts that shows all of your different artifacts grouped, I would think, by category. They should be able to be grouped, sorted by category, and even filtered by department. That would be a great help as well. Updating artifacts and having them easily updated from an edit field—no matter where they are placed, whether it is in a dashboard, on a whiteboard, or in a message—should be easy. The person who created the artifact, or whoever has editing rights, should be able to click right in, make those changes, and have those changes directly tied to that artifact so you can see how it evolved and what was changed. PS there is no category here for Artifacts. (Seems like an oversight to me...)

When ClickUp Brain generates slide decks, one-pagers, or other file artifacts in chat, they only exist inside that specific conversation thread. There's no way to browse, search, or organize them after the fact. I'd love a dedicated Artifacts hub (similar to the Docs hub or Whiteboards hub) where all AI-generated files are automatically collected. Ideally you could tag them, attach them to tasks or projects, and search across everything you've ever generated. Without this, useful outputs get lost the moment you close or delete the chat. These files deserve to be as first-class as Docs already are.

Brain Artifacts (slides, documents, etc.) published via run.clickup.ai are currently accessible to anyone with the link, including people completely outside our workspace. Since ClickUp increasingly serves as the single source of truth for entire organizations, this is not just a missing feature — it's a critical data leak vector. Any artifact generated from workspace data (tasks, docs, dashboards) can unintentionally expose sensitive business information: financials, strategy docs, internal metrics, client data, and more. There is currently no way to restrict visibility or require internal approval before an artifact goes live on a public URL. Proposed Solution: Default to private. Artifact links should only be accessible to authenticated workspace members by default. Public publishing as an explicit opt-in. If a user wants to share an artifact externally, they should submit a "publish publicly" request. Admin approval workflow. Workspace admins (or a designated security role) should review and approve/deny public publish requests, ensuring sensitive data doesn't leave the organization without oversight. Visibility indicator. Clearly show whether an artifact is private (workspace-only) or public, so creators and viewers always know the exposure level. Why this is urgent: This isn't a nice-to-have. Organizations trusting ClickUp with their entire operational data need confidence that AI-generated outputs inherit the same permission model as the source data. Right now, every artifact created from internal data is one shared link away from being fully exposed to the internet. The more powerful Brain becomes, the higher the risk.

From support ticket: user would like holidays to be applied to Workload view

The new Brain capability to generate and publish HTML artifacts (slide decks, pages, etc.) on run.clickup.ai is genuinely game-changing. It bridges the gap between ideation and polished output in a way no other project management tool does. However, the current editing workflow requires Brain to regenerate the entire artifact on every revision, which becomes painfully slow and error-prone for larger decks (15+ slides). In many cases the generation simply fails mid-way, forcing users to start over or abandon the edit entirely. The fix feels straightforward: allow users to target a specific slide or section for editing rather than reprocessing the whole file. Most real-world edits are surgical (swap a headline, tweak one chart, adjust copy on slide 9) not structural. If Brain could scope its regeneration to just the selected section, it would dramatically reduce latency, eliminate most timeout/error issues, and make iterative refinement actually viable. This single improvement would make ClickUp the obvious first choice for enterprise slide creation, no Canva or Google Slides detour needed.