Can someone from the ClickUp team or beta testers confirm if the new Workload View v2 includes the ability to analyze workload based on Time Remaining (Time Estimate - Time Tracked) instead of only Time Estimate?

The existing Workload view uses Time Estimate as the sole metric for capacity calculation. This means a task estimated at 30 hours with 25 hours already tracked still shows 30 hours of workload, making capacity planning inaccurate for ongoing projects.

I see great features announced for v2 (Work by Day, Multi-Interval Scheduling, Second-level Grouping), but without Time Remaining as a calculation option, these improvements won't solve the fundamental issue of accurate workload assessment.

For medium-to-large organizations managing complex, long-running projects, the ability to view actual remaining work (not original estimates) is essential for:

Please confirm if Time Remaining analysis is included in v2, or if this is planned for future iterations. This capability is critical for scaling ClickUp in enterprise environments.

Hi, I hope that export utilization percentages from the Workload view are included in the Workload View V2 rework. Many companies and organizations require this kind of reporting for utilization, and it would be very helpful if they could easily export it directly from the Workload view.

This may be what Vasil Enchev is mentioning in his post (would love confirmation though!) but I'd LOVE the ability to weight a task time estimate across certain days.

For example, we may have a task that has a 2d duration and 4 hours of time estimate. It'd be incredible to be able to weight those hours in a custom way across those 2 days:

Day 1: 3 Hours

Day 2: 1 Hour

This is because a lot of our tasks are multiple days because of revision/review cycles, but the bulk of the work is front-loaded in those task durations.

Another example, our editor is putting together a video edit. They lock in on the task on Day 1 and track 4 hours, but then we review internally the next day and there may be just an hour or two of work remaining to be done on Day 2.

This would let us balance our workload a lot more accurately, because right now we're giving tasks 2 days to account for review cycles, but because it equally splits the time estimate across those two days, it's not an accurate representation of how the workload will actually be distributed.

Is this planned Vasil Enchev

This feature should highlight team members in RED and not GREEN when they have too few allocated hours in the Workload view.

Hope i'm not too late for some feedback! Vasil Enchev

I'm a solo ClickUp user (no team) and rely heavily on the Workload view to plan my days based on available hours rather than fixed calendar blocks.

I would love the ability to sort tasks in the Workload view by priority (similar to List view). This would allow me to plan tasks on a specific day, stay under my daily capacity, and simply work top-down by priority — without constantly adjusting start/end times in the Calendar view when tasks take more or less time than expected.

This would turn Workload from a capacity warning tool into an actual day-planning tool for solo users, or users which only view their own workload.

External meetings (e.g. Google Calendar / Google Meet events) are currently not counted toward workload. This creates a real risk of overplanning, as my day may look “under capacity” in ClickUp while in reality it already contains 1–2 hours of meetings.

Ideally, external calendar events could either:

– count toward workload capacity, or

– be optionally included as non-task workload blocks.

This would greatly improve workload accuracy for solo users who combine deep work with client meetings.

This also counts for planned breaks.

Thanks a lot!

It would be nice to be able to group workload by project, so we can see an overall estimate for each project's timeframe and how long has been taken, rather than filter and see it split across multiple assignees.

Vasil Enchev - feedback about the Second-level Grouping; it would be helpful to have an option to minimize the 2nd grouping too (if you want to see the drilldown for the assignees collapsed as you might be browsing through quite a few of them and only care about the rolled up hours for each of them, and not seeing the individual tasks

If a vacation day is indicated in the calendar, the workload should take it into account

When a task is assigned to a member and the allocation exceeds their available time according to the set Work Schedule (8h), the system should trigger a warning or error notification.

This notification should clearly indicate that the user is already fully booked for that time period, helping prevent over-allocation and ensuring realistic workload planning.

Betas open —and you can sign up for each one below:

See side-by-side with (farewell, tab-hopping). Plus a clear subgroup right next to individual assignees—overloads pop instantly.

Turn Workload into a . Plan and tweak —right inside Workload—so balancing teams finally feels easy. Type hours directly into each day and watch capacity light up 🟢 in real time.

Split one task into multiple (each with its own start/end) so work that starts, pauses, and resumes stays in task. No extra subtasks, clearer capacity signals.

Pick your adventure—or join all three. We’ll add teams on a rolling basis and would love your feedback 🚀