Feature Requests

There are no security permissions that can be set to control who can create a task type. We want to limit this to specific roles. We are on the custom field by task type beta and having other users able to create multiple task types can get confusing.

It would be useful if admins could restrict limited members to view only. Currently, members can give limited members access beyond view only, which incurs a cost. We want to avoid having to monitor limited members and the access that has been given to them by members.

Right now, the ability to see which Docs, Lists, and views in your workspace have been publicly shared — and to manage or restrict that sharing — is locked to the Enterprise plan. That's a problem for every team below Enterprise, because: -You can't audit your own exposure. Anyone on your workspace can generate a public link to a Doc, and admins on lower tiers have no consolidated way to see what's currently shared, when it was shared, or by whom. -ClickUp has bugs. We all file them. Sharing behavior is exactly the kind of surface where an unexpected bug shouldn't be undetectable for the customer. -Sensitive client and internal docs live in ClickUp. SOPs, client deliverables, contracts, internal strategy. Visibility into what's shared externally is a baseline trust requirement, not an advanced governance feature. -Most paid SaaS tools include this at every tier. Notion, Google Workspace, Asana, Confluence — sharing visibility and admin controls over public links are part of the base product. What I'm asking for: -A workspace-level view of all publicly shared items (Docs, Lists, views, etc.) with who shared them and when — available on Unlimited, Business, and Business Plus. -Admin ability to restrict or disable public sharing at the workspace, Space, or role level — available on Business and above. -Keep advanced governance (audit log exports, SCIM, SSO-tied policies, compliance tooling) on Enterprise. That's a fair line. Sharing visibility isn't a premium feature. It's how customers verify the product is behaving the way they think it is. Please reconsider the packaging.

Hello! I'm a system administrator for a company with 120 employees, and I'm hoping to make a feature request. I would really appreciate it if we could have more control over custom permissions for each individual, and the ability to create permissions based on more options. Specifically, I'd like to set permissions for things like creating or copying a list, moving tasks to certain statuses, and restricting access to creating or updating labels. Basically, I want complete control over what each person can create or edit. For example, I'd like to restrict certain people from editing specific custom fields. Currently, the role system is limited, and some members have the same permissions as others, which isn't ideal. Many of my supervisors are members, but I don't want them all to have access to everything. While there are different roles we can create, the options for setting permissions are very limited. It would be great if we could have more flexibility in creating custom permissions for each individual.

I would like to be able to customize our guest's complete visualization. In other words, turn off certain portions of the ClickUp interface. Example: the right hand panel (activity/chat) in task view, the Sidebar, etc

From support ticket: Is there a way for me to claim ownership of folders where we had someone help out by setting them all to private with specific sharing permission. (I'm already a full member on the folders)

I personally would like to see the gamut of UML for developmers, but Mermaid has that and more https://mermaid-js.github.io/mermaid/#/

I have a user that is part of 3 teams and because I've shared the "IDC Roadmap" with all 3 teams (for which there is minimal, but some, overlap in membership), there are 3 copies of the same shared item. Even crazier, is that if I collapse one "Steering Committee" folder, all 3 collapse. So, the system knows it's the same but doesn't know it's being displayed multiple times.

I know you can hide custom fields from guests but, as we collaborate with clients who have guest permissions, it would be helpful to be able to hide our comments/activity section from guest users so they don't see the nitty-gritty back and forth but can view the relevant custom fields, settings, attachments, etc.

Hi, We are currently organizing our workflow in one centralized “Field Jobs” list because it significantly improves dispatching, coordination, and operational visibility. Previously, we tried separate lists per technician, but this caused several problems: tasks disappearing from the main workflow poor dispatch overview duplicate field visits difficult coordination between office and technicians We also tested: Limited Members task sharing automations individual Teams per technician While partially workable, these solutions still create friction because tasks must be manually shared/unshared and technicians can still gain unnecessary visibility over time. What we really need is a simple permission option such as: “User can only view tasks assigned to them.” This would allow: centralized dispatch management clean scheduling workflow better operational overview privacy between technicians The biggest advantage of the centralized system is that there is no need to constantly move tasks between lists, and for field service operations everything stays organized in one place and on one board/map. This would be extremely valuable for: field service companies dispatch centers workshops maintenance teams mobile technicians Thank you for considering this feature request.