Feature Requests

Currently, there's no option to enable AI tools for specific users only, and some users might not need this feature at all. Please consider introducing a feature similar to GitHub Copilot integration: the organization is billed monthly for the number of seats selected for given users.

Since Clickup is deep in openai ecosystem, please upgrade the underlying model powering Clickup Brain's searching and writing with GPT-5 full version instead of 4o. Searching is still very bad with Brain and it's writing could be improved heavily.

Just adopted ClickUp for collaboration on projects with customers, but trying to use it as much as possible for other business task management as well. I love the concept of Super Agents, and created 2 to play around with it. I created one that send me a daily summary of things I need to get to, but...no integration with M365/Outlook. Only Google. Really? Why?? I don't know about the US, but here in Canada over 80% of SMBs I deal with are in M365! Wouldn't that integration make A LOT of people happy? Cheers!

It'd be dope if clickup AI would support https://modelcontextprotocol.io/ . With that its agent could instantly integrate with a ton of tools without you having to do first party integrations in the first place. Some tools like cursor.ai just allow you to paste in an MCP link and bam, you have it in your agent. Support this ONE thing and save time integrating all the others. Let your users do the job and give them the power to integrate properly.

It would be great to be able to use AI to quickly generate clean, and cool looking whiteboards. Currently the AI Brain in whiteboard only generates images, and they are all cut off. Instead, i'd like to ask it to "pull all tasks from this board as headers with unique colors, and put descriptions as sub sticky notes". That way I could create a quick org chart, or view of specific tasks quickly, efficiently, and in a cool looking way. On some other tools this involves importing .json and .csv data which most LLM/AI tech can work with. If I could simply copy and paste in such formats and choose my template look or describe it then it would save tons of time in the long run. No current workaround to generate formatted whiteboard material. I can almost get there by importing .csv or .json as tasks using import or AI Brain. Then I have to drag in each tasks. However, once I try to do any whiteboarding the AI just generates faulty images instead of editable structures in a useful format. Final goal, open whiteboard, ask AI to pull in tasks I've already got of a tag type from X project, tell it to build a color coded structure using bubbles at the top and stickies below it (or from template example), and presto it builds a structure. Example attached. I've use a different tool and AI to do this with prompts so it's very possible. Giving users a few preset prompts and styles would solidify this as useful for all sorts of purposes in the whiteboard tool.

Hi ClickUp team, In our workspace we use several AI agents (for example supporting accounting, purchasing, sales, and personal organization), and we increasingly work with them together in shared chat threads. One recurring wish: We would love to have a kind of "virtual team room" where I can see all participating agents at the same time, as if they were sitting around a table in a meeting. In such a view it would be possible to: • see all agents (and ideally the human participants) at a glance, • clearly see which agent is currently active or has just responded, and • deliberately bring topics, documents, or tasks to the whole group without having to explain the same context multiple times. Background: we use agents to coordinate different areas like accounting, purchasing, sales, and personal workflows. A shared "agent meeting room" would help us to: • discuss plans and timelines in one central place, • make coordination more efficient, and • avoid duplicate communication. I would love to see such a central view in the future – similar to a meeting room, but for agents (plus us as users). Best regards, Dirk Riesenbeck

Hey ClickUp team! 👋 First off, love what you've been doing with ClickUp Brain — it's become an essential part of my daily workflow. However, I have some feedback and a request regarding the recent AI model updates. ### The Problem: With the recent switch to Claude Opus 4.6 in ClickUp Brain, I've noticed a significant downgrade in my experience: ⏳ Speed: Opus 4.6 is noticeably slower compared to the previous Opus 4.5. Response times have increased considerably, which disrupts my workflow and kills productivity, especially when I'm relying on Brain for quick iterations. 📉 Output Quality: For certain tasks — particularly [content generation / summarization / code assistance / task planning] — Opus 4.6 doesn't perform as well as Opus 4.5 did. The responses feel less precise and sometimes miss the mark compared to what I was getting before. Sonnet 4.5 is missing too: Sonnet 4.5 was a great middle ground — fast, efficient, and surprisingly capable for most everyday tasks. I'd love to have it back as an option. ### The Request: 🔄 Bring back Claude Opus 4.5 and Sonnet 4.5 as selectable model options in ClickUp Brain. Having the ability to choose between model versions would let users pick what works best for their specific use case — speed vs. depth, quick tasks vs. complex reasoning. 🧠 Add Extended Thinking support — Claude's extended thinking feature allows the model to reason through complex problems step-by-step before generating a response. This would dramatically improve output quality for tasks like: - Complex project planning and breakdown - Detailed technical writing and analysis - Multi-step problem solving - Strategic brainstorming and decision-making ### Suggested Implementation: Add a model selector dropdown in ClickUp Brain settings (or per-conversation) so users can switch between available Claude models (Opus 4.5, Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, etc.) Add an "Extended Thinking" toggle (on/off) for when users want deeper, more reasoned outputs and don't mind a slightly longer wait Optionally, set default models per workspace so teams can standardize ### Why This Matters: Not every task needs the latest model — sometimes the previous version just works better for specific jobs. Giving users the flexibility to choose empowers us to get the best results from ClickUp Brain without being locked into a one-size-fits-all approach. Newer doesn't always mean better for every use case. Choice = productivity. 🚀 --- Would love to hear if others in the community feel the same way. Drop a 👍 if you want model selection and extended thinking in ClickUp Brain! Thanks for listening, ClickUp team! 💜

I would like to suggest introducing a feature that allows exporting details (e.g., space, folder, list, etc.) related to the use of automations and AI. This would make it easier to locate the automations being used and quickly understand which ones have the greatest impact on costs. Currently, there are two separate functionalities that cannot be correlated and lack the ability to export or filter: Usage Details / Usage Breakdown with total numbers Log of executed automations Similar to: https://feedback.clickup.com/feature-requests/p/feature-usage-list

The AI notetake lists the date in US format (MM/DD/YYY). It would be good to choose DD/MM/YYYY as most of the world uses that format over the US one.

We would like to enable time-entry note visibility and evaluation for ClickUp AI Agents so they can help enforce time-tracking hygiene at scale. Specifically, we need an agent-accessible tool or permission that exposes time-entry details per time log, including: Time entry note text Associated task User Date range / duration This would allow our Workspace Project & Time Compliance Manager agent to programmatically detect: Missing or blank time-entry notes Notes below a configurable word-count threshold Once detected, the agent should be able to: Flag non-compliant entries by posting standardized task comments (tagging the user and key leaders) Move affected tasks into a designated “Time Entry Note Compliance” list Aggregate counts of missing or low-quality notes by user and project for inclusion in scheduled health/compliance reports This capability would allow us to fully automate our weekly Time Entry Note Compliance workflow and significantly improve data quality and accountability without manual review. Agent profile for reference: https://app.clickup.com/2383354/ai/agents/28qfu-121931