Feature Requests

Linked Tasks work well for our workflow because they carry across when a task is duplicated to a new board. However, Linked Tasks cannot currently be used for grouping, which creates duplicate admin work. Use case: We have an Active Clients List in our CRM. We use a Relationship field to associate tasks with a single client and group tasks by client. However, Relationship fields do not carry across when tasks are duplicated to new boards. To work around this, we also use Linked Tasks because they carry across boards and allow us to see all related work against a client. The issue is that Linked Tasks cannot be grouped by, so we are forced to populate both the Client Relationship field (for grouping) and Linked Tasks (for cross-board continuity and visibility). Summary: Please allow tasks to be grouped by Linked Tasks, or allow Relationship fields to persist across duplicated tasks and boards. This would remove duplicate data entry, improve workflow efficiency, and reduce admin overhead.

Can we please get the option of drag/drop for tasks on a board view with 'Sort' enabled

There seems to be no option for getting notified specifically for responses to activity postings (without getting notified for any activity posting).

Description: Currently, I use the Planner tool daily to map out my work blocks. However, I find it time-consuming that I cannot duplicate or copy existing blocks (Events). Every time I have a recurring or similar task block, I have to create it from scratch. Requested Feature: Add a "Duplicate" option when right-clicking an Event in Planner. Allow Alt+Drag (or similar shortcut) to quickly copy a block to another time slot or day.

I would like to suggest several improvements to the text functionality inside Shapes. Ability to remove links from text Currently, when you paste or add text with a hyperlink inside a Shape, there is no way to remove the link while keeping the text. There should be an option to remove the hyperlink styling from the text. Basic text formatting inside Shapes Please add the ability to apply basic text styles within Shapes, such as bold and italic, to individual words or lines. This would make it much easier to structure and emphasize information. Text highlighting It would also be very helpful to add the ability to highlight specific words or lines with color inside Shapes. This is important for clearer visual organization and better readability of different points within a Shape.

When a task is blocked by another, the blocked task shows a yellow warning signal, while the task that blocks it shows a red signal. I think it's a bit the other way around. If I see a red sign on a task, I think it's blocked, while a yellow alert means that there are no problems, just something to pay attention to. Don't you think so?

I need an option to hide deactivated or remove users from Assignee filter. It make me a little confused when I see a lot of users no longer available in the organization in the Assignee filter and I rarely need to see their tasks.

Hello, ClickUp team. I'm experiencing a behavioral change in my workspace views and I need official confirmation if this is a product change or if there is any way to restore previous operation. Context: I work with Kanban (Board) and List views to manage content schedules. Previously, in Kanban mode, cards clearly displayed several custom fields directly on the card, organized visually, such as: • Post date • Responsible • Priority • Referring month • Funnel • Media These fields appeared on the card in a manner similar to a mini-table, allowing you to view everything without opening the task. Current situation: • In Kanban, these fields no longer appear on the card, even though they exist, are filled out and active in the workspace. • I didn't find any more settings in the view that would allow you to display these fields as before. • In List mode, some fields (such as Date) also don't automatically appear as a column, even though they are created and linked to the list. • The fields exist, are correct, and appear only when opening the individual task. What has already been verified: • Custom fields were not deleted. • The views are correct (List and Kanban). • Workspace permissions are correct. • This is not an active filter. • The behavior changed compared to how it worked before (I have visual records of how it appeared). Objective question: 1. Has ClickUp officially removed the display of custom fields directly on Kanban cards? 2. Are there any current settings that allow you to restore this type of view in Kanban? 3. In List mode, what is the expected behavior for Data-type fields to appear as a column? 4. Is this behavior part of the new “task view” or any recent view migration? I have prints of the previous behavior and the current behavior for comparison. I await official confirmation to understand if this is a current product limitation or if there are any specific steps to restore this view. Thank you.

Good morning, I tested ClickUp for 5-10 minutes to see if I could integrate it into a small non-profit project. The application on the Kanban side is very complete but I didn't want to go any further because the interface was too unintuitive, the whole interface is dark, I have no visual reference, I have to look for the functionality I want in the label window (User Story) and that's just a waste of time and energy. It's a shame because compared to Trello the application is more complete and permissive. I would also like to see the possibility of customizing the visual aspect a little more one day, such as adding a wallpaper (at least in a free version) as is done on Trello. In short, I liked the diversity of features offered in the free version, they are relevant but my experience is marred by UX. regards

Currently, using a combination of status/task type on the board view is completely redundant since the board shows every single task type in the workspace. Really need the ability to either select what task types are visible on the board (preferred) or at least have the ability to hide empty task type values. This is going to be more important with the ability to associated custom fields to task types as it increases the importance and usage of task types