Teams hub | Organizational Chart
beta
Vasil Enchev
Interactive org chart build from workspace members and their managers that shows team structures, roles, and reporting lines in a single, visual view.
Quickly see who reports to whom, trace any person’s management chain, and jump straight into profiles or chats from Teams Hub and user profiles. This makes it fast to understand ownership, find the right teammate, and navigate growing organizations without digging through docs or asking around.
Log In
Vasil Enchev
marked this post as
beta
Org Charts are now in Beta 🚀 - if you submitted the form you should be enrolled now! If not, it's not too late to join! 👉 Beta Signup Form
And... Don't forget to give us feedback! Here or in the form. Thanks!
Stacey Lopez
Vasil Enchev The org chart is looking good!
* I like the area to the side that aggregates which members do not have a manager associated to their profile.
...Liked the quick access to be able to edit those. I noticed that if the role title is filled in you don't see the "Select Manager" dropdown, so it would be nice to have those boxes display 3 lines instead of just two, to avoid extra clicks into the ellipsis/more actions area.
....Feels easy to navigate and was quick to respond while zooming in and out.
* Would like a way to "remove" a member from org chart association.... or have a way to bucket them off to the side.
...Example 1: Roles that I interact with from ClickUp who have access (are a member) but are not part of my company structure.
...Example 2: Roles that are generic (I have a general IT role that is not part of the organizational hierarchy as well as a Test role used to test things in different views)
* One thing I wasn't sure about... when I click from the org chart to the profile card, there is messaging to "Set up your work schedule and Set working days/hours and holidays for your workspace" -- those are already set up workspace-wide, so I'm wondering if I am only seeing that because I am an Admin or if everyone sees that? When I clicked into either link, the dialog box just disappeared.
Dimitri Weslosky
Thanks, Vasil Enchev ! Just signed up for the Beta release. Do you know when the next batch will go out? I would love to give feedback on this ASAP and use it for our team.
Erin Walker
Vasil Enchev - The biggest ask I have is that I need to include people that are not in ClickUp. I don't have every member of every team in ClickUp, but I'd like them in the org chart. Then I can set automations based on who the manager is. Particularly helpful for manage approvals on software/hardware requests.
Stacey Lopez
Vasil Enchev I'm curious to see if this org chart is it's own entity (only showing Manager > Direct Reports structure); to me, this is a "Department" structure, not a project "Team". -- how does an Org Chart relate to a working team when your project is cross functional and you take a role or two from every department to get the work done?
Ideally, the ClickUp "Teams" actually could show individuals (who are cross-functional, not just manager-related), so that for any Project list I create, I have the ability to automatically capture and display the individual users who are a "Team" in that project. (without having to manually create a new ClickUp 'Team' for every project - we have hundreds of projects!)
Right now I am having to create that grouping manually in a very roundabout way by using the Task Type 'Person', and then creating individual tasks with a title of each Role to show everyone who has a role in the project, and then assigning someone to that role. So much extra work when the system already knows the people involved in a project (It can see all of the "Person" type designations such as assignees, and then I have custom fields for the Person type to show additional involvement, such as Collaborator, Reviewer and Follower)
Ugh! --- the information is already in the system; I really wish this was easier!
Vasil Enchev
Stacey Lopez: Fair call-out! What’s going in beta read more like a department / reporting-line org chart than a “working team” view for cross-functional project delivery.
What we’re actively discussing on our side is how to support matrix management (e.g., the “solid line / dotted line” concept you’ll see in tools like Okta and Workday), so a person can belong to a functional org and be part of a project team without forcing you to create a brand-new “Team” for every project.
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE)
Hi Vasil Enchev are we in Beta or Building Canny Status
When updating the manager of the user to reflect the update in the chart the desktop app needs to be reloaded, it would be great to have a refresh button on the org chart itself.
Vasil Enchev
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE) Beta is days away - sign up here:
if a manager is changed, the org chart will update live without the need of refreshing
Jason Joseph
This chart has some room room for improvement. Here are my thoughts:
The team member cards are needlessly thin, which means they arent providing enough at a glance info, the profile images are too small and the chart is spread too wide.
Think more like a baseeball card and less like a truncated url rich preview in an Apple Notes and aim somewhere in between for a vastly improved experience.
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE)
Vasil Enchev Yes, I agree here too.
Vasil Enchev
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE) Jason Joseph
There is an additional view, exactly like baseball cards - showing only current level of the chart (screenshot).
In terms of seeing more data, that won't be in the first version but eventually the idea is to have custom fields and choose visible fields + ability to edit them.
Jason Joseph
Vasil Enchev thats great. I'm cautiously optomistic of the use of the word customize in CLickUp though. Case in point the Home Bar, in which customize allows a user to choose what shows up, but does not allow them to chose the order in which they appear.
Also how does one get to this view? It appears to be a xcreenshot of a whiteboard.
When clicking these users, a best practce would be for them to open in detail in the same way tasks open on a panel on the right. And with the ability to see their workload.
Jarod McPherson
Vasil Enchev Will this Require EVERYONE in the organization to be a user on clickup? or will non-users be able to be add (with picture as well)?
Vasil Enchev
Jarod McPherson right now it works only with users who are members, that's a good candidate for a follow up feature request.
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE)
Vasil Enchev I agree with Jarod - we need to have the ability to add non-ClickUp users, since this is an org chart, one missing person can break the chain.
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE)
Vasil Enchev I just finished mapping my actual users, and without my executive leadership in Clickup this breaks, and an organization our size we are not going to get all the users in
Vasil Enchev
Ryan MacAlmon (HPE) Noted! I communicated this with the team. We are discussing ways in which that could change.
Jason Joseph
Vasil Enchev what about agents....?
Vasil Enchev
Jason Joseph: Agents are coming to org charts! They will optionally show as ICs under the creator. You will be able to turn them off. It looks really cool!
Vasil Enchev
Beta is getting closer 🚀 Get your team among the first to try the new
Organizational Chart
—sign up here:A
Alexandra Can Sakhara
can this also show who has access to what list. greatly needed feature! rather than going into every list, it's not clear enough., or if this exists somewhere already please could you point me to it thanks
Eguskiñe del Valle
Alexandra Can Sakhara This would help a lot and make life much easier for administrators! We definitely need this feature.
Vasil Enchev
Alexandra Can Sakhara Eguskiñe del Valle that's a cool idea, we'll see if it could be implemented easily to have it from the start.
Mykyta Skibinskii
can this be integrated with Entra ID? This is needed only for Enterprise, and we won't be able to manage both Entra and ClickUp manually (which will make this non-usable). Especially if SCIM is already there, it shouldn't be that a huge difference.
Meaning... Imagine doing that twice for a couple hundreds of users, lol :-)
Vasil Enchev
Mykyta Skibinskii: Totally get what you mean, this is not something easy to mange twice for a big organization, I imagine this would qualify as a separate feature sync with Entra.
I found this canny request and mentioned this to a PM in charge of these sort of features.
Kim Hoang (BF)
As a Project Manager or Portfolio Lead, I want a native Top-Down Hierarchical Mind Map view for my project structure, So that I can visualize and report on Deliverables and Work Packages rather than just a list of granular tasks.
Value Statement / Motivation
In high-level project governance, the Steering Committee and stakeholders prioritize the Result Breakdown Structure (RBS) and Scope of Work (SOW). While current tools are excellent at tracking thousands of individual tasks, they often fail to communicate the "Big Picture."
For complex builds (such as apps, websites, or infrastructure), the focus must shift from Activity (what the team did) to Outcome (what has been delivered). A vertical, top-down WBS view, similar to WBS Schedule Pro here https://criticaltools.com/WBS%20Schedule%20Pro%20Overview.html . Allows leadership to instantly grasp the project architecture and the status of major deliverables at a glance.
Acceptance Criteria
Vertical Orientation: A toggle to switch Mind Map layouts from horizontal (brainstorming) to a Top-Down vertical hierarchy (WBS).
Custom Depth Control: The ability to collapse/expand levels so I can show the Steering Committee only the "Deliverable" and "Work Package" layers without the "Task" noise.
Status Roll-up: Visual indicators on the parent nodes (colors or progress bars) that reflect the aggregate progress of the child elements.
Logic-Based Linking: The hierarchy should automatically reflect the Folder > List > Task structure of the project without manual manual dragging/dropping.
Exportable Format: The ability to export this top-down view as a PDF or PNG for executive status reports.
Vasil Enchev
marked this post as
building now
Load More
→