Lock limited members at view only
planned
S
Sophie Weber
It would be useful if admins could restrict limited members to view only. Currently, members can give limited members access beyond view only, which incurs a cost. We want to avoid having to monitor limited members and the access that has been given to them by members.
Log In
Viktor Lesyk
No automatic permission or role changes should be possible, especially if they lead to unexpected costs.
Any changes like that must require explicit approval from the workspace owner or admins with respective permissions.
Alex Morgan
CRITICAL!
Clemence Wiart
Yes!!
The other BIG problem is when a limited member submits a form, they are marked as the "Task Creator" and are automatically given FULL permissions to edit the task as they please. No. They are "read-only" or "comment-only" for a reason. This a huge issue.
Armine Seropyan
planned
S
Sophie Weber
Alternatively, if this is impossible to achieve, could sharing default to view-only instead of full-edit? That way accidentally giving too much access to limited members and going over the seat limit would be less likely.
Armine Seropyan
Sophie Weber: Thank you for your feedback. We are working on a feature that will allow you to control access for Limited members, including the ability to set them as view-only for all content.
S
Sophie Weber
Armine Seropyan Great, thanks for the update
Tim Jasper
This is critical. Its great that we can add (view only) limited members which are free users with access to chats and direct channels. However this completlely undermines permissions if a limited member (full access) can simply share a task with full permissions with a (view only) limited member and then that member becomes a fully paid user. LIMITED MEMBERS SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO INCURR COSTS FOR OUR BUSINESS! Please fix this ASAP