Group by single item (labels, assignee, tags, etc.)
under review
Scar
Currently if one task was assigned to multiple assignee, this group of assignee will become an "assignee" to show with other single assignee, this is good for tasks, however this is not good to see the task load for each assignee, I would like to have a option to group by only single assignee, even some of the assignee may have the same task.
Log In
Rosie Burke
Just run into another issue this is causing - we have a complex project that spans across teams - I have added a custom field called Team and want to show all tasks relating to each team. However, some tasks are assigned to more than one team. Rather than placing the task under each team's heading, it is creating a new group - see example in screenshot - what I wanted is for that example task to appear under the Marketing bucket and under the Sales bucket but it has created a new bucket with both Sales and Marketing included - this is really unhelpful. I urgently need this feature to go live!
Rosie Burke
Yes please! We are particularly struggling with this when reviewing our Sprints.
Natalie Williams
Any updates here Michael Van Doorn? I'm running into issues multiple times a week with the way labels, assignees, and tags are getting grouped together instead of individually.
If I've got labels 'A', 'B', and 'C' and a task has labels 'A' and 'C' then I need it to show up under 'A'
and
under 'C' not under 'A+C' this multiple grouping scenario makes it way to easy for things to get missed because you don't have one place to look for all tasks with label 'A' instead you've got to check for 'A', 'A+B', 'A+C', and 'A+B+C' which is wildly inefficient. And if you're trying to use labels or tags as reference points, you're constantly updating the filter settings to try to get only what you want instead of being able to simply use the main group by option.
Michael Van Doorn
Hey, Natalie Williams:
We have List view + Assignee support undergoing Code/QA review now which we'll be releasing before supporting every grouping type + view type. We expect this to be released in the coming weeks.
We're aligned with you that grouping items as their individual values is the preferred experience and is something we are looking to support for all view types + grouping types in the future.
Natalie Williams
Michael Van Doorn how far off in the future for grouping by individual tags or labels?
Rosie Burke
Michael Van Doorn - hoping you say just days away! Please see my latest example. This is really holding back our progress and leading to discussions about how perhaps we should be using Jira (which our development team uses already)...
Cindy Callens
We are also struggling with this. We use the timeline view to visualise allocation of resources within projects and R&D to certain locations. However, when one project needs multiple locations, we now have the combination showing, but the single equipment is still showing as empty/available. This doesn't help our project and resource planning at all.
Clemence Wiart
Any updates? :(
Mitch Schwartz
for the love of god please.
T
Tom Hemerka
Michael Van Doorn would love to see this come out soon. In my current use case I'm managing campaigns and applying a custom tag field called locations. I'd like to be able to have the timeline view breakout each individual location tag rather than each unique combination of locations. This would allow us to show ownership and C suite leadership what's happening in each market very easily.
Geraldine Bell
Is there any update on this? Grouping by every unique combination of labels is unhelpful. Should be able to toggle on or off.
Joshua Borger
Would love to see this come as soon as possible! Would be very helpful
T
Teofrenz Ycot
Michael Van Doorn Please also apply this feature to the new groupings such as in relationships. 🙏
Load More
→